Does it generate thumbnails for images? Can the thumbnail size be configured? Does it index archive files (zip, tar, bz2, rar, 7zp, etc) recursively? Tellico () (comic books, videos, music, coins, stamps, trading cards, video games, wines, board games, and file listings) Stuffkeeper () (a new kid on the block which seems to support anything!). GCstar () (books, movies, music, video games, wine) Qcat (allows importing whereisit catalogs in xml :D) ()ĭata Crow () (video games, music, books, movies, images) - very powerfull and will soon support cd/dvd/usb/etc scanning for indexing files and maybe even reach a sticky somewhere :p no feedback), it will at the very least this thread will contain a list of cataloging software. Well, even if this thread doesn't come out to be what I expected (i.e. movies, games, music).īTW, I inform that both Beagle and Tracker may support removable media indexing in the future (check the above article at wikinfo). One other thing is that at first I wanted something like whereisit (to index my documents, archives, pics and videos), but them I noticed that there was more to it. I was hopping for comments like, "I use application appA because it supports features X, Y, Z and application appB didn't support it, although appB did had feature W, which appA doesn't has" This is because the forum doesn't support the use of tables and it would be usefull to more people as well. The results of this "Comparison of cataloging software" could then be transformed in a table and hosted at (wikipedia will just delete it due to the lack of 3rd party references believe me it has happened before with my Comparison of desktop search software ()). The purpose of this thread is to get feedback from its users and compare each tool, so that we can all pick the best tool for our needs. The problem now is that I know of dozens of applications but am unable to compare them. While I searched, I kept finding more and more software. Our recommendation is to use a single volume for the data, as mentioned above.Since I've switched from windows to Linux that I've been trying to find a good cataloging software to replace whereisit. The default volumes are not optimal nor recommended. LinuxServer specifies a couple of optional default volumes such as They also maintain images for most of the popular download clients as well. Is one of the most prolific and popular Docker image maintainers. Hotio also builds our Pull Requests which may be useful for testing. Images are automatically updated multiple times in an hour if upstream changes are found. There are many ways to manage Docker images and containers too, so installationĪnd maintenance of them will depend on the route you choose.ĭoesn't specify any default volumes, besides To install and use these Docker images, you'll need to keep the above in mind while following their documentation. Keep in mind that Readarr will need read and write to the download folders as well as the final folders.įor a more detailed explanation of these issues, see The recommendation is to use a common group for all related containers so that each container can use the shared group permissions to read and write files on the mounted volumes. The default user, group and umask, you should decide this before setting up all of your containers. Most images have environment variables that can be used to override Permissions and ownership of files is one of the most common problems for Readarr users, both inside and outside Docker. If this advice is not followed, you may have to configure a Remote Path Mapping in the Readarr web UI (Settings › Download Clients). The best solution is to use a single, common volume Some also recommend paths for the download client container that are different from the Readarr container, like This causes slow moves and doesn't allow hard links because theyĪre considered two different file systems Both problems can be solved with well planned, consistent paths. The second is a performance issue and causes problems for seeding torrents. torrents/My.Book.2018/, but in the Readarr container that might be at The first is a problem because the download client will report a download's path as There are two common problems with Docker volumes: Paths that differ between the Readarr and download client container and paths that prevent fast moves and hard links. These instructions provide generic guidance that should apply to any Readarr Docker image. However, a number of third parties have created and maintain their own. The Readarr team does not offer an official Docker image.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |